I’ll contact you separately about the Wikipedia stuff – updating some of those pages is on our todo so it would be great to discuss that. I’ll also send you an SVG.

Re the licence: the brand maps are under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License – that’s fine for Wikipedia? Any problems with that otherwise – perhaps it would be better to make it public domain?

I’d like to upload the KDE brand map to Wikipedia in order to illustrate the KDE article, but I’m not sure whether it’s published under a copyleft license.

Could you tell me which is the copyright status of the image, and do you agree to this usage? In that case, would you mind to provide a .svg version or a higher resolution png? Thanks, and good work!

It’s everywhere

Really, I meant the big KDE bit at the top to represent the community that produces all the stuff that branches out below – although you could also see the blue KDE ellipse as just representing the umbrella brand.

For your last point: yep, KDE is the name of the community. Initially, back in 1996, KDE was the thing we produced. For some years I think KDE has been used both to refer to things and the community. I think Aaron mentioned it somewhere, this leads to: “KDE releases KDE KDE 4.3″ in which the KDEs are 1. community, 2. umbrella brand and 3. the Software Compilation.

I want to say “Nice to see it!”
It is easy to understand what happened when I see your schema.

BUT
I think you could have shown where the community is in your schema.
Did you forgot? or just not did want to?

KDE *IS* the name of our community now,
while it used to only be the name of “things”, right ?

–
Mickaël Sibelle.